Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Faculty
    • Forms, Policies, Guidelines & Procedures
    • Cayuse
    • Intent To Submit a Proposal
    • Time and Effort (T&E)
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Research Insights
    • Office of Technology Commercialization
    • Laboratory Animal Resources (LAR)
    • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
    • Institutional Review Board (IRB)
    • Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
    • Travel Resources and Investments Program (T.R.I.P.)
  • Students
  • Departments
    • Research Analytics
    • Research Administration
    • Research Integrity
    • Research Enhancement
    • Clinical Research
    • Research Operations
  • Analytics
    • ARGO
    • Control Tower
    • Datapulse
    • Degree Progression Monitoring (DPM)
    • Discovery Site
    • Facuty Insight
    • Academic Analytics
    • Reports and Dashboards
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Annual Reports
    • News Archive
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Research Pathways
    • Centers and Institutes
    • Meet the Senior Vice President for Research
    • Associate Deans for Research
    • Committees
    • Personnel
    • Office Locations
  • About
DIRECTORY
MAPS
MYUTRGV
UTRGV
The University of Texas
Rio Grande Valley
DIRECTORY
MAPS
MYUTRGV
News
GIVE
Open Search Menu
Menu
utrgv logo
Division of Research
  • Home
  • Faculty
    â–Ľ
    Faculty Square placeholder image 300px
    Faculty

    Streamlining research processes at UTRGV. Access tools and guidance for compliance, proposal submissions, funding, and more

    • Forms, Policies, Guidelines & Procedures
    • Cayuse
    • Intent To Submit a Proposal
    • Time and Effort (T&E)
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Research Insights
    • Office of Technology Commercialization
    • Laboratory Animal Resources (LAR)
    • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
    • Institutional Review Board (IRB)
    • Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
    • Travel Resources and Investments Program (T.R.I.P.)
  • Students
  • Departments
    â–Ľ
    Departments Square placeholder image 300px
    Departments

    The Division of Research at UTRGV is dedicated to advancing and supporting the university's research activities, benefiting students, faculty, and staff.

    • Research Analytics
    • Research Administration
    • Research Integrity
    • Research Enhancement
    • Clinical Research
    • Research Operations
  • Analytics
    â–Ľ
    Analytics Square placeholder image 300px
    Analytics

    The Analytics Hub provides centralized access to key tools like ARGO, Control Tower, Data Pulse, DPM, and Academic Analytics, empowering data-driven decisions across research, academics, and operations at UTRGV.

    • ARGO
    • Control Tower
    • Datapulse
    • Degree Progression Monitoring (DPM)
    • UTRGV Discovery Site
    • UTRGV Facuty Insight
    • Academic Analytics
    • Reports and Dashboards
  • News
    â–Ľ
    News Square placeholder image 300px
    News

    Research Communications enhances the visibility and impact of research activities across UTRGV. Our mission is to ensure that UTRGV’s research reaches both internal and external audiences, enhancing the university’s research reputation.

    • Latest News
    • Annual Reports
    • News Archive
  • About
    â–Ľ
    About Square placeholder image 300px
    About

    Discover UTRGV’s Division of Research, supporting high-impact research and scholarship across all disciplines.

    • Leadership
    • Research Pathways
    • Centers and Institutes
    • Meet the Senior Vice President for Research
    • Associate Deans for Research
    • Committees
    • Personnel
    • Office Locations
  1. Home
  2. Departments
  3. Research Analytics
  4. ARGO - Sponsored Program Intake
  5. Steps in the Approver Review Process
In This Section
Menu

Research Analytics Menu

  • From Vision to Precision: UTRGV’s R1 Mission
  • Academic Analytics
  • ARGO
  • ARGO Dashboard
  • ARGO - Sponsored Program Intake
    • Approver Review Process
    • Communication Section
    • Compliance Section
    • Funding Source Section
    • How to Export a proposal as PDF
    • Key/Senior Personnel Section
    • Proposal Details Section
    • Proposal Information Section
    • Steps in the Key Personnel Review & Certifications Process
    • Submit for OSP Review Section
    • Subrecipient/Collaborator Section
    • Upload Documents Section
  • Carnegie Classification
    • Comparison Summary
    • Growth Rate by Institution
    • Year-over-Year (YoY) Growth Rate Comparison
  • Control Tower
  • Data Pulse
  • Data Storage and Computing
  • Degree Progression Monitoring
  • Doctoral Insights Engine
    • Dissertation Chairs Dashboard
    • Doctoral Students Info Dashboard
    • Doctoral Students Lifecycle
    • DPM Dashboard
    • Earn Rate Dashboard
    • Navigate Dashboard
  • Glossary
    • Function Glossary
    • NSF HERD - GLOSSARY
      • Type of Research
  • Grad College Smart Forms
  • IPEDS
    • Comparing Similar Institutions to UTRGV Based on Graduate Enrollment
    • Geographical Institution Graduate Enrollment
    • Institution Degree Awarded Over Time
    • Institution Degree Awarded Profile
    • Institution Fall Graduate Enrollment Over Time
    • Institution Fall Graduate Enrollment Profile
    • IPEDS data dictionary
    • Research Degrees Awarded Comparison
  • IRIS
  • NSF HERD
    • Tracking Institutional Research Expenditures Over Time
    • Comparative Summary: Benchmarking UTRGV
    • Geographical Distribution: Mapping Research Investment
    • Tree Diagram: Research by Source and Discipline
    • Expenditure by Source of Funds
    • Expenditure by Research Field/Discipline
  • Reports
    • Annual Report Dashboard
    • Awards and Proposal Summary
    • Expense Classification
    • IDC Dashboard
    • ORU Dashboard
    • Project Burn Rate
    • Project Listing
    • Proposal Approvals
    • Qualtrics DoR Survey Dashboards
    • Research Pathways & SPI Questions
    • Research Productivity
    • Weekly OSP Report
  • Training and Support
  • 30/60/90 - Day Pre-Closeout

Contact Us

Research Analytics
researchIT@utrgv.edu
(956)-882-4113

Quick Links

  • Forms, Policies & Guidelines
  • Staff Directory

Steps in the Approver Review Process

The Approver Review Process in the Sponsored Program Intake (SPI) system is a critical step for ensuring that all aspects of a proposal are thoroughly reviewed and approved by key stakeholders before submission to an external sponsor. This process involves multiple reviewers, each with specific roles and responsibilities, who must evaluate and approve the proposal based on compliance, resource allocation, and alignment with institutional goals. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how this process works: 

Steps in the Approver Review Process

  1. Accessing the Proposal:
    • Each designated approver receives a notification when a proposal requires their review.
    • Approvers can click on each section in the SPI form to review details, attachments, and compliance information. For a comprehensive review, approvers can use the Export Proposal (PDF) button to download a complete PDF copy of the proposal.
  2. Roles and Responsibilities of Approvers:
    • Pre-Award Director: Reviews proposal details to ensure it meets submission guidelines, budgetary compliance, and institutional policies.
    • Department Head of PI: Confirms the proposal aligns with the department’s strategic objectives, resources, and personnel commitments.
    • ORU (Organized Research Unit) Director: Reviews proposals linked with organized research units, ensuring compliance with specific unit guidelines and resource allocation.
    • Dean of PI: Confirms that the proposal supports the academic and research goals of the school or college.
    • AVP for Research Operations: Provides final institutional approval, ensuring the proposal adheres to all institutional policies and external sponsor requirements.
  3. Adding Comments and Feedback:
    • Each approver has the option to leave Comments to document observations, suggest changes, or raise concerns.
    • If an approver identifies issues or requires modifications, they may use the comments section to provide specific feedback to the proposal's principal investigator (PI) or research staff.
  4. Approval or Disapproval:
    • Approval: If the approver is satisfied with the proposal, they can select “I confirm I have reviewed this proposal and I approve it for submission.” This indicates their endorsement, allowing the proposal to proceed in the review chain.
    • Disapproval: If the approver has significant concerns or believes the proposal does not meet institutional standards, they can select “I do not approve.” This option requires a comment to explain the reason for disapproval, which allows the PI and research team to address issues.
    • In cases of disapproval, the proposal may be routed back to the PI for revisions and resubmission.
  5. Sequential Approval Flow:
    • The SPI system often requires sequential approvals, meaning that each approver must complete their review before the proposal advances to the next approver in the hierarchy.
    • For instance, the Department Head of the PI might need to approve the proposal before it moves to the Dean or the AVP for Research Operations.
  6. Final Submission to Sponsor:
    • Once all approvers have provided their endorsements, the proposal is marked as Approved for submission.
    • At this stage, the proposal record in SPI reflects the “Submitted” status, indicating readiness for submission to the sponsor.
    • The Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) then completes any final checks before formally submitting the proposal to the external funding agency. 

Key Considerations in the Approver Review Process

  • Transparency and Accountability: The approver review process ensures that each level of the institution has reviewed the proposal, fostering accountability and thorough vetting.
  • Documentation: Comments and approvals are documented in the SPI system, creating an audit trail that can be reviewed later if necessary.
  • Timeliness: Approvers are encouraged to complete reviews promptly to avoid delays in the proposal submission process. The sequential nature of approvals means that delays at one level can impact the overall timeline.
  • Feedback Loop: If any approver disapproves the proposal, it creates a feedback loop where the PI and research team can address issues and resubmit. This iterative process helps strengthen the proposal’s quality and alignment with institutional expectations.

Division of Research


Brownsville

research@utrgv.edu
BBRHB 2.210

(956)-296-1549

Edinburg

research@utrgv.edu
ESSBL 5.110

(956)-665-3883

Hours

Monday - Friday
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM CST

Find us on Social Media


LIKE. FOLLOW. SUBSCRIBE. ADD.


UTRGV
  • CARES, CRRSAA and ARP Reporting
  • Site Policies
  • Required Links
  • Accreditation Statement
  • Fraud Reporting
  • Senate Bill 18
  • Clery Act Reports
  • Web Accessibility
  • Mental Health Resources
  • Sexual Misconduct Policy
  • Reporting Sexual Misconduct
  • Contact UTRGV
  • 1-844-ATUTRGV
  • Facebook
  • X Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Academics
  • Admissions
  • Cost and Financial Aid
  • Student Life
  • Search Programs
  • First-Year Students
  • Transfer
  • International Students
  • Graduate Students
  • Current Students
  • Faculty Resources
  • Staff Resources
  • UTRGV Careers
  • Visit Campus
  • Directory
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley