Excellence in Hybrid Teaching Evaluation Rubric
Categories of Criteria |
3 – Superior |
2 - Limited |
1 – Weak/NA |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of Online Course Design – Quality Matters Review |
The course meets Quality Matters Standards at or above 85%. |
The course does not meet Quality Standards within 80-84%. The course objectives mostly aligns and addressed. |
The course does not meet Quality Matters Standards below 80%. |
Exceptional Instructional Strategies
|
Relationship between all in-class and out-of-class activities is clearly explained. Clearly explains how class time is conducted on a regular basis; providing percent of time used for lecture, collaborative or individual work, etc. Includes a calendar or outline detailing the structure of the course and both the in-class and out-of-class expectations. Includes accountability measures to ensure students are ready for both in-class and out-of-class activities and assessments. Instructional Strategies have a broad and deep impact on student learning. It provides an opportunity for deeper learning through at least three areas of higher-level thinking skills, offers a range of cognitive demand commensurate with the content; and, provides appropriate direction and scaffolding. |
Relationship between some in-class and out-of-class activities is clearly explained. Instructional Strategies has minimal impact on student learning. It provides an opportunity for deeper learning through fewer than three areas of higher-level thinking skills, offers a range of cognitive inconsistently matched with the content; and, provides incomplete direction or scaffolding. |
No clear relationship between in-class and out-of-class activities. No accountability measures to ensure students are ready for in-class and out-of-class activities. Unlikely to achieve any impact on student learning. Does not provide an opportunity for deeper learning through higher-level thinking skills; it does not offer a range of cognitive demand commensurate with the content and does not provide appropriate direction or scaffolding. |
Excellent Course Facilitation: The nominee demonstrates best practices in hybrid course facilitation by creating both faculty and peer-to-peer presence to include but not limited to:
|
Course facilitation fosters positive, engaging, and successful learning experiences by adopting three or more best practices in hybrid course facilitation. Consistent integration between in-class and out-of-class activities and assessments. Consistent and appropriate opportunities for student engagement in-class and out-of-class.
|
Course facilitation fosters positive, engaging, and successful learning experiences by adopting less than two best practices in hybrid course facilitation. |
Course facilitation does not foster positive, engaging, and successful learning experiences. |
Effective Learning Outcomes
|
Has provided examples, such as:
It provides three or more types of evidence for Deeper Learning opportunities. |
It provides minimal evidence for Deeper Learning opportunities. |
Does not include evidence for Deeper Learning opportunities. |
Enable Accessibility
The review team will evaluate the course for Accessibility standards. |
All course components and functionality comply with current ADA accessibility standards. |
Course components or functionality comply with current ADA accessibility standards within 90-96% range. |
The course does not comply with current ADA accessibility standards. |
Recommendations – Feeback on Course Effectiveness |
The application includes strong letters of |
The application includes good letters of |
The application does not include a letter from a recommendation from a administrator/colleague or student. |
*Synthesized from Eight Rubrics developed by ACHIEVE, under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. , Definition & Rubric of Innovative Teaching & Learning developed by The Innovative Learning Institute, and Innovation Award Rubric developed by Cornell Center for Teaching Innovation.